STUDI KOMPARASI ANTARA METODE KONVENSIONAL DAN METODE KLASIKAL TERHADAP KEBERHASILAN MEMBACA AL-QUR’AN

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) conventional and classical methods in TPQ. (2) the success of reading Al-Qur'an Santri. (3) Whether or not there is a difference between the use of Conventional and Classical methods for the success of reading Al'qur’an Santri at TPQ. This research is a quantitative study with a population of 62 santri and the sample taken is 62 santri. The method of data collection in this study uses questionnaires as the main method, supported by interview methods, and documentation to complete the data obtained from the questionnaire method. the results of the questionnaire distributed to the research object, or the pretest results processed in analyzing the data through the t test formula. Based on the results of the analysis it can be concluded that: (1) That the application of conventional methods in class "A" is not so helpful so that 23.87% of students choose the "A" answer, while those who choose "B" answer 55.48%. This means that they agree with the use of conventional methods in learning to read the Qur'an. The 16.45% and 4.19% of santri disagree about the importance of using conventional methods in learning to read the Qur'an, the application of classical methods to the class "B" falls into the good category of the success of the Al-Qur'an Education Park in learning reading the Koran properly and correctly, (2) That the success of learning to read the Koran in the Al-Qur'an Educational Park in class "A" using conventional methods reaches numbers (6.74) or 209. while in class "B" using the classical method reaches the number (7.45) or 231. The distance between the two reaches 0.71. This shows that the number (degree) of class "B" using the classical method is better than the class "A" which uses the conventional method. (3) That the comparative value of the success of learning to read the Qur'an in the class "A" and class "B" is: - 4.67 smaller than the value of t table -2.003 or reaches the number> - and this number indicates that the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted, namely there is a difference between the use of conventional methods and methods classical towards the success of learning to read the Al-Qur'an Al-Qur'an Students in the "A" and "B" classes.